Big yawn. Maybe they are too busy eating peaches to do something really creative. And perhaps I'm spoiled by the many design barriers this website shattered to be impressed with Atlanta's sleepy work.
I am not a web designer but as a grahic designer I think it looks clean and organized. It loads fast .... It uses splashes of imagery, which I think we still lack with our site minus some of our skins ... and it has a consistent structure.................
I guess my question to you more web savy folks would be why you think it sucks so bad? What sites are currently shattering barriers? and why .....
I agree with Ali, it's clean, organized and well architected. It's a bit conventional ... whether that's a good or bad thing is a question of project goals I would think.
Big yawn. Maybe they are too busy eating peaches to do something really creative. And perhaps I'm spoiled by the many design barriers this website shattered to be impressed with Atlanta's sleepy work.
I agree w/Greg. Ali - maybe you could explain what it was about the ATL site that made you QP it?
I am not a web designer but as a grahic designer I think it looks clean and organized. It loads fast .... It uses splashes of imagery, which I think we still lack with our site minus some of our skins ... and it has a consistent structure.................
I guess my question to you more web savy folks would be why you think it sucks so bad? What sites are currently shattering barriers? and why .....
I agree with Ali, it's clean, organized and well architected. It's a bit conventional ... whether that's a good or bad thing is a question of project goals I would think.
I especially like the POLLING STATION they have.